Application of Rough TOPSIS Technique for the Analysis of Engineering System Failure Causes | Journal of Engineering Sciences

Application of Rough TOPSIS Technique for the Analysis of Engineering System Failure Causes

Author(s): Emovon I.*, Nwaoha T. C.

Affilation(s): Federal University of Petroleum Resources, P.M.B. 1221, Effurun, Delta State, Nigeria

*Corresponding Author’s Address: [email protected]

Issue: Volume 5; Issue 2 (2018)

Dates:
Paper received: May 28, 2018
The final version of the paper received: June 28, 2018
Paper accepted online: June 30, 2018

Citation:
Emovon, I., Nwaoha, T. C. (2018). Application of rough TOPSIS technique for the analysis of engineering system failure causes. Journal of Engineering Sciences, Vol. 5(2), pp. E1-E6, doi: 10.21272/jes.2018.5(2).e1

DOI: 10.21272/jes.2018.5(2).e1

Research Area: MECHANICAL ENGINEERING: Computational Mechanics

Abstract. The prioritization of the causes of engineering system failure posed to be a challenge. Therefore, there is a need to develop a tool that will be used to identify critical problems of an engineering system to facilitate decision making in allocation of available resources in ensuring optimal system performance. In this paper, a rough technique for order preference by similarity to the ideal solution (Rough-TOPSIS) is proposed, which combines rough set theory and TOPSIS for the prioritization exercise in uncertain engineering environment. The technique is exemplified with a numerical example and advanced using information from experts. From the result of the analysis, factors/causes hampering the optimal performance of the engineering system have been revealed in order of importance. The proposed approach have comparative advantages over other hybrid methods as it can easily be implemented with hand calculation/spreadsheet, without requiring additional tools to evaluate decision criteria weights and aggregate experts opinions.

Keywords: rough set theory, Rough TOPSIS, engineering system, failure causes, decision criteria.

References:

  1. Ohajianya, A. C., Abumere, O. E., Owate, I. O., & Osarolube, E. (2014). Erratic Power Supply in Nigeria: Causes and Solutions. International Journal of Engineering Science Invention, Vol. 3, No. 7, pp. 51–55.
  2. Olaoye, T., Ajilore, T., Akinluwade, K., Omole, F., & Adetunji, A. (2016). Energy crisis in Nigeria: Need for renewable energy mix. American Journal of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 1–8.
  3. Sambo, A. S., Garba, B., Zarma, I. H., & Gaji, M. M. (2012). Electricity generation and the present challenges in the Nigerian power sector. Journal of Energy and Power Engineering, Vol. 6, No. 7, pp. 1050.
  4. Emovon, I., & Nwaoha, T. (2018). Power generation problems ranking using a combination of AHP AND MOORA techniques. Research in Logistics and Production, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 155–168.
  5. Emovon, I., & Samuel, O. D. (2017). Prioritising alternative solutions to power generation problems using MCDM techniques: Nigeria as case study. International Journal of Integrated Engineering, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 11–17.
  6. Stević, Ž., Tanackov, I., Vasiljević, M., & Rikalović, A. (2017). Supplier evaluation criteria: AHP rough approach. 27th International Scientific Conference on Industrial Systems, pp. 298–303.
  7. Pawlak, Z. (1982). Rough sets. International Journal of Computer and Information Sciences, Vol. 11, No. 5, pp. 341–356.
  8. Abu-Donia, H. M. (2012). Multi knowledge based rough approximations and applications. Knowledge-Based Systems, Vol. 26, pp. 20–29.
  9. Song, W., Ming, X., Wu, Z., & Zhu, B. (2014). A rough TOPSIS approach for failure mode and effects analysis in uncertain environments. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 473–486.
  10. Zhai, L. Y., Khoo, L. P., & Zhong, Z. W. (2009). A rough set based QFD approach to the management of imprecise design information in product development. Advanced Engineering Informatics, Vol. 23, 2, pp. 222–228.
  11. Löken, E. (2007). Use of multicriteria decision analysis methods for energy planning problems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 11, 7, pp. 1584–1595.
  12. Emovon, (2016). Multi-criteria decision making support tools for maintenance of marine machinery systems. PhD thesis, School of Marine Science and Technology, Newcastle University, UK.

Full Text



© 2014-2024 Sumy State University
"Journal of Engineering Sciences"
ISSN 2312-2498 (Print), ISSN 2414-9381 (Online).
All rights are reserved by SumDU