Optimal Layout of the Head Drive for a Self-Supporting Bucket Elevator of High Productivity

Author(s): Kurhan V.1*, Sydorenko I.1, Kurgan V.1, Dudko R.1, Bershak S.2

Affiliation(s):
1 Odesa Polytechnic National University, 1, Shevchenka Ave., 65044, Odesa, Ukraine;
2 Odesa National Maritime University, 34, Mechnikova St., 65029, Odesa, Ukraine

*Corresponding Author’s Address: [email protected]

Issue: Volume 11, Issue 2 (2024)

Dates:
Submitted: June 29, 2024
Received in revised form: September 6, 2024
Accepted for publication: September 16, 2024
Available online: September 21, 2024

Citation:Kurhan V., Sydorenko I., Kurgan V., Dudko R., Bershak S. (2024). Optimal layout of the head drive for a self-supporting bucket elevator of high productivity. Journal of Engineering Sciences (Ukraine), Vol. 11(2), pp. A22–A29. https://doi.org/10.21272/jes.2024.11(2).a3

DOI: 10.21272/jes.2024.11(2).a3

Research Area: Machines and Tools

Abstract. The article deals with bucket elevators of high productivity. The demand for grain crops is growing worldwide, requiring transportation, transshipment, and storage in huge volumes. Based on this, it is urgent to solve the problem of increasing the productivity of bucket elevators in the self-supporting version. The problem is that increasing performance requires increasing the drive’s power, leading to a significant weight increase. This imposes a limit on the height of the bucket elevator. A considerable weight at a high altitude significantly reduces the stability of the structure itself. For the most part, this problem was solved by limiting the height or productivity of the bucket elevator. The construction of a self-supporting bucket elevator, possible layouts of the head drive, and advantages and disadvantages were considered. Three bucket elevators with different heights, productivity, and belt width were selected to determine the optimal layout. Four drive options were calculated for each design, and a comparative analysis was carried out using a graphical method. The analysis showed that one of the biggest problems is the displacement of the center of mass relative to the central plane of the bucket elevator. As a result, means to ensure the smallest displacement coefficient relative to the vertical axis of the bucket elevator were presented. Advantages, disadvantages, and the possibility of constructive implementation of the layouts were also considered.

Keywords: drive arrangement, product innovation, high productivity, center of mass, rigidity.

References:

  1. Ma, Y., Cui, R. (2024). Bucket Elevator. In: Tao, D., Yan, Y., Dong, D., Zhang, D. (Eds.) Handbook of Port Machinery. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4848-2_21.
  2. Chen, Z. (2024). Bucket Chain Ship Unloaders. In: Tao, D., Yan, Y., Dong, D., Zhang, D. (Eds.) Handbook of Port Machinery. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4848-2_26
  3. Chikelu, P.O., Nwigbo, S.C., Obot, O.W., Okolie, P.C., Chukwuneke, J.L. (2023). Modeling and simulation of belt bucket elevator head shaft for safe life operation. Scientific Reports, Vol. 13, 1083. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-26060-x
  4. Gelnar, D., Zegzulka, J. (2019). Bucket Elevator Filling and Discharge. In: Discrete Element Method in the Design of Transport Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05713-8_4
  5. Gurudath, B., Kumawat, K.K., Tejaswi, V., Sondar, P.R., Rakshan Kumar, J.K., Hegde, S.R. (2021). Failure analysis of a bucket elevator shaft. Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 21, pp. 563–569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-020-01101-7
  6. Ma, F., Xiong, F., Li, G. (2019). Key structure innovation and optimization design of bucket elevator. In: Wang, K., Wang, Y., Strandhagen, J., Yu, T. (Eds.) Advanced Manufacturing and Automation VIII. IWAMA 2018. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, Vol 484, pp. 623–627. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2375-1_78
  7. Kurgan, V., Sydorenko, I., Bovnegra, L., Pavlyshko, A., Kirkopulo, K. (2023). Stabilization of natural frequency oscillation equipment when changing its weight. In: Tonkonogyi, V. et l. (Eds.) Advanced Manufacturing Processes IV. InterPartner 2022. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, pp. 455–464. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16651-8_43
  8. Sydorenko, I., Semenyuk, V., Lingur, V., Bovnegra, L., Kirkopulo, K. (2022). Relaxation shock absorbers with additional mechanical control circuit. In: Tonkonogyi, V. et al. (Eds.) Advanced Manufacturing Processes III. InterPartner 2021. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, pp. 655–663. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91327-4_63
  9. Gelnar, D., Zegzulka, J. (2019). Basic Description of Bucket Elevators. In: Discrete Element Method in the Design of Transport Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05713-8_3
  10. Zheng, J. (2024). Bucket Wheel Ship Unloaders. In: Tao, D., Yan, Y., Dong, D., Zhang, D. (Eds.) Handbook of Port Machinery. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4848-2_33
  11. Park, F.C., Kim, J.W. (1999). Singularity analysis of closed kinematic chains. Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 121(1), pp. 32–38. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2829426
  12. Li, Y. (2024). Catenary Chain Bucket Ship Unloaders. In: Tao, D., Yan, Y., Dong, D., Zhang, D. (Eds.) Handbook of Port Machinery. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4848-2_27
  13. Li, S. (2024). En Masse Ship Unloaders. In: Tao, D., Yan, Y., Dong, D., Zhang, D. (Eds.) Handbook of Port Machinery. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4848-2_28
  14. Gelnar, D., Zegzulka, J. (2019). The Optimization of Bucket Discharge to Maximize the Transported Volume and to Minimize Material Fall Down the Shaft. In: Discrete Element Method in the Design of Transport Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05713-8_13
  15. Ma, Y., Chen, L. (2024). Introduction to Port Continuous Conveying Machinery. In: Tao, D., Yan, Y., Dong, D., Zhang, D. (Eds.) Handbook of Port Machinery. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4848-2_15
  16. Gelnar, D., Zegzulka, J. (2019). Conclusion. In: Discrete Element Method in the Design of Transport Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05713-8_14
  17. Woo, S. (2023). Engineering (Dynamic) Load Analysis. In: Design of Mechanical Systems. Springer Series in Reliability Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28938-5_2

 

Full Text

© 2024 by the author(s).

This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International License