Thermodynamic and Economic Evaluation of Gas Turbine Power Plants | Journal of Engineering Sciences

Thermodynamic and Economic Evaluation of Gas Turbine Power Plants

Author(s): Oyegoke T.1, 2, Akanji O. I.2, Ajayi O. O.3, Obajulu E. A.2, 4, Abemi A. O.2

1 Laboratoire de Chimie, ENS, l’Universite de Lyon, 69007 Lyon, France;
2 Chemical Engineering Department, Ahmadu Bello University Zaria, Nigeria;
3 Chemical Engineering Department, Federal University of Technology Minna, Nigeria;
4 Chemical Engineering Technology Department, Federal Polytechnic Nasarawa, Nigeria

*Corresponding Author’s Address: [email protected]

Issue: Volume 7, Issue 1 (2020)

Paper received: December 20, 2019
The final version of the paper received: April 18, 2020
Paper accepted online: May 2, 2020

Oyegoke T., Akanji I. I., Ajayi O. O., Obajulu E. A., Abemi A. O. (2020). Thermodynamic and Economic Evaluation of Gas Turbine Power Plants. Journal of Engineering Sciences, Vol. 7(1), pp. G1–G8, doi: 10.21272/jes.2020.7(1).g1

DOI: 10.21272/jes.2020.7(1).g1

Research Area:  CHEMICAL ENGINEERING: Advanced Energy Efficient Technologies

Abstract. Thermodynamic analysis and economic feasibility of a gas turbine power plant using a theoretical approach are studied here. The operating conditions of Afam Gas Power Plant, Nigeria are utilized. A modern gas turbine power plant is composed of three key components which are the compressor, combustion chamber, and turbine. The plants were analyzed in different control volumes, and plant performance was estimated by component-wise modeling. Mass and energy conservation laws were applied to each component, and a complete energy balance conducted for each component. The lost energy was calculated for each control volume, and cumulative performance indices such as thermal efficiency and power output were also calculated. The profitability of the proposed project was analyzed using the Return on Investment (ROI), Net Present Worth (NPW), Payback Period (PBP), and Internal Rate of Return (IRR). First law analysis reveals that 0.9 % of the energy supplied to the compressor was lost while 99.1 % was adequately utilized. 7.0 % energy was generated within the Combustion Chamber as a result of the combustion reaction, while 33.2 % of the energy input to the Gas Turbine was lost, and 66.8 % was adequately converted to shaft work which drives both compressor and electric generator. Second law analysis shows that the combustion chamber unit recorded lost work of 248.27 MW (56.1 % of the summation), and 77.33 MW (17.5 % of the summation) for Gas Turbine, while air compressor recorded 11.8 MW (2.7 %). Profitability analysis shows that the investment criteria are sensitive to change in the price of natural gas. Selling electricity at the current price set by the Nigerian Electricity Regulation Commission (NERC) at zero subsidies and an exchange rate of 365 NGN/kWh is not profitable, as the analysis of the investment gave an infinite payback period. The investment becomes profitable only at a 45 % subsidy regime.

Keywords: energy conversion system, gas turbine, economic analysis, second law analysis, power plant.


  1. Abam, D. P. S., Moses, N. N. (2011). Computer simulation of a gas turbine performance. Global Journal of Researches in Engineering, 11(1), pp. 37–44.
  2. Abam, F. I., Ugot, I. U., Igbong, D. I. (2011). Thermodynamic assessment of grid-based gas turbine power plants in Nigeria. Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering and Applied Sciences, Vol. 2(6), pp. 1026–1033.
  3. Anozie, N., Ayoola, P. O. (2012). The influence of throughput on thermodynamic efficiencies of a thermal power plant. International Journal of Energy Engineering, Vol. 2(5), pp. 266–272.
  4. Barinaadaa, T. L., Vining, J. (2015). Thermodynamic performance analysis of a gas turbine in an equatorial rain forest environment. Journal of Power and Energy Engineering, Vol. 3, pp. 11–23.
  5. Habib, M. A., Said, S. A., Al-Bagawi, M. (1995), Thermodynamic analysis of Ghazian power plant. Energy, 20(11), pp. 1121–1130.
  6. Haung, F. F. (1990). Performance evaluation of selected combustion gas turbine cogeneration system based on first and second law analysis. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, Vol. 112, pp. 117–21.
  7. Khodak, E. A., Romathova, G. A. (2001). Thermodynamic analysis of air-cooled gas turbine plants. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, Vol. 123, pp. 265–270.
  8. Kotas, T. J. (1995). The Exergy Method of Thermal Plant Analysis. Krieger Publishing Company, Malabar, India.
  9. Obadote, D. J. (2009). Energy crisis in Nigeria: Technical issues and solutions. Power Sector Conference, Abuja, Nigeria.
  10. Ofodu, J. C., Abam, D. P. S. (2002). Exergy analysis of Afam thermal plant. Nigeria Society of Engineers Transaction, Vol. 37, pp. 14–28.
  11. Okafor, E. O. (2008). Development crisis of the power supply and implications for industrial sector in Nigeria. Kamla-Ray Journal, Vol. 6, pp. 83–92.
  12. Oyegoke, T., Jibril, B. E. Y. (2016). Design and feasibility study of a 5MW bio-power plant in Nigeria. International Journal of Renewable Energy Research, Vol. 6(4), pp. 1496–1505.
  13. Oyegoke, T., Akanji, F. I. (2017). Energy Conversion System and Analysis. A Ph.D. Seminar Paper on Thermodynamic Analysis of Complex Processes, Chemical Engineering Dept., Ahmadu Bello University Zaria.
  14. Pathirathna, K. A. B. (2013). Gas turbine thermodynamic and performance analysis methods using available catalog data. M.Sc. thesis in Sustainable Energy Engineering, University of Gavle.
  15. Paul, B. (2016). Gas Turbine Power Generation. Elsevier, London.
  16. Rahman, M. M. (2011). Influence of operating conditions and ambient temperature on the performance of gas turbine power plant. Advance Material Research, Vol. 189-193, pp. 3007–3013.
  17. Rahman, M. M., Thamir, K. I., Ahmed, N. A. (2011). Thermodynamic performance analysis of gas-turbine power-plant, International Journal of the Physical Sciences, Vol. 6(14), pp. 3539–3550.
  18. Rosen, M. A., Scott, D. S. (2003). Entropy production and exergy destruction: Part I. Hierarchy of Earth’s major constituencies. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Vol. 28(12), pp. 1307–1313.
  19. Tara, C. V., Ravi, S. B., Rangaraya, C. J. (2013). Exergy analysis of gas turbine power plant. International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology, Vol. 4(9), article no. 3991.
  20. Tekin, T., Bayramoglu, M. (1998). Exergy analysis of the sugar production process from the sugar beets. International Journal of Energy Research, Vol. 22, pp. 591–601.
  21. Thamir, K. B., Rahman, M. M. (2012). Effect of compression ratio on performance of combined cycle gas turbine. International Journal of Energy Engineering, Vol. 2(1), pp. 9–14.
  22. Tony, G. (2006). Gas Turbine Handbook: Principles and Practices. CRC Press.
  23. Trinks, W. (2004). Industrial Furnace. John Wiley and Sons.
  24. Umar, S., Ahmad, M., Ali, F. K., Hafiz, M. Q. A., Imran, S. (2015). Thermodynamics analysis of natural gas fuel based furnace/boiler integrated with steam power plant: A theoretical approach. Research Journal of Chemical Sciences, Vol. 5(12), pp. 20–24.

Full Text

© 2014-2024 Sumy State University
"Journal of Engineering Sciences"
ISSN 2312-2498 (Print), ISSN 2414-9381 (Online).
All rights are reserved by SumDU