Implementation of Efficient Artificial Neural Network Data Fusion Classification Technique for Induction Motor Fault Detection | Journal of Engineering Sciences

Implementation of Efficient Artificial Neural Network Data Fusion Classification Technique for Induction Motor Fault Detection

Author(s): Altaf S.1, Mehmood M. S.2, Imran M.3

Affilation(s):
1 Sensor Network and Smart Environment Research Centre, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand;
2 Sajid Brothers Engineering Industries, Awais Qarni Road, Gujranwala, Pakistan;
3 Ministry of Industries and Production, Islamabad, Pakistan

*Corresponding Author’s Address: saud.altaf@aut.ac.nz

Issue: Volume 5; Issue 2 (2018)

Dates:
Paper received: June 7, 2018
The final version of the paper received: September 18, 2018
Paper accepted online: September 22, 2018

Citation:
Altaf S. Implementation of Efficient Artificial Neural Network Data Fusion Classification Technique for Induction Motor Fault Detection / S. Altaf, M. S. Mehmood, M. Imran // Journal of Engineering Sciences. – Sumy : Sumy State University, 2018. – Volume 5, Issue 2. – P. E16-E21.

DOI: 10.21272/jes.2018.5(2).e4

Research Area: MECHANICAL ENGINEERING: Computational Mechanics

Abstract. Reliability measurement and estimation of an industrial system is a difficult and essential problematic task for control engineers. In this context reliability can be described as the probability that machine network will implement its proposed functions under the observing condition throughout a specified time period of running machine system network. In this study single sensor method is applied for fault diagnosis depending on identification of single parameter. At early stages it is hard to diagnose machine fault due to ambiguities in modeling environment. Due to these uncertainties and ambiguities in modeling, decision making become difficult and lead to high financial loss. To overcome these issues between the machine fault symptoms and estimating the severity of the fault; a new method of artificial intelligence fault diagnosis based approach Dempster–Shafer theory has been proposed in this paper. This theory will help in making accurate decision of the machine condition by fusing information from different sensors. The experimental results demonstrate the efficient performance of this theory which can be easily compared between unsurpassed discrete classifiers with the single sensor source data.

Keywords: Dempster–Shafer theory, data fusion, fault diagnosis, artificial neural network, fast Fourier transform.

References:

  1. Fan, X. F., & Zuo, M. J. (2006). Fault diagnosis of machines based on D–S evidence theory. Part 2: Application of the improved D-S evidence theory in gearbox fault diagnosis. Pattern Recognition Letters, Vol. 27, pp. 377–385.
  2. Fan, X., & Hu, Y. (2007). Target Identif ication Based on Neural Network and D-S Evidence Theory. Transactions of Shenyang Ligong University, Vol. 26, No. 5, pp. 33–36.
  3. Yen, J. (2003). Discussion of Dempster’s–Shafer’s Theory. D. Hall, State College, PA.
  4. Gestel, T. V., & Suykens, J. A, Lanckriet, K., Lambrechts, G., De Moor, B., & Vandewalle, J. (2002). Bayesian Framework for Least Squares Support Vector Machine Classifiers, Gaussian Processes and Kernel Fisher Discriminant Analysis. Neural Computation, Vol. 15, No. 5, pp. 1115–1142.
  5. Denoeux, T. (1999). Reasoning with imprecise belief structures. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, pp. 79–111.
  6. Luo, H., Yang, S.-L., Hu, X.-J., & Hu, X.-X. (2012). Agent oriented intelligent fault diagnosis system using evidence theory. Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 39, Issue 3, pp. 2524–2531.
  7. Smets, P. (1990). The combination of evidence in the transferable belief model. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 12, No. 5, pp. 447–458.
  8. Basir, O., & Yuan, X. (2007). Engine fault diagnosis based on multi-sensor information fusion using Dempster-Shafer evidence theory. Information Fusion.
  9. Yager, R. R. (1987). On the Dempster-Shafer framework and new combination rules. Information Sciences, Vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 93–137.
  10. Zadeh, L. A. (1986). Simple view of the dempster-shafer theory of evidence and its implication for the rule of combination. Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 85–90.
  11. Murphy, R. R. (1998). Dempster-Shafer theory for sensor fusion in autonomous mobile robots. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 197–206.
  12. Dubois, D., & Prade, H. (1988). Representation and combination of uncertainty with belief functions and possibility measures. Computational Intelligence, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 244–264.
  13. Murphy, C. K. (2000). Combining belief functions when evidence conflicts. Decision Support Systems, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 1–9.
  14. Zhang, J., Fan, X., Huang, C., & Chen, T. (2008). Fusion monitoring system of locomotive wheel set state. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, Vol. 8, No. 6, pp. 13–19.
  15. Asakura, T., Kobayashi, T., & Hayashi, S. (1999). A study of Fault Diagnosis System Using Neural Networks. Proceedings of IMEKO-XV World Congress TC-10, pp. 39–44.
  16. Adgar, A., Cox, C., & MacIntyre, J. (1998). Automatic fault diagnosis for rotating machinery using statistical and neural network techniques. 11th International Congress and Exhibition on Condition Monitoring and Diagnostic Engineering Management “COMADEM 98”.
  17. Zolghadri,A. (1996). An Algorithm for Real-Time Failure Detection in Kalman Filters. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Vol. 41, No. 10, pp. 1537–1539.
  18. Buczak, A. L., & Uhrig, R. E. (1993). Hybrid neural network – fuzzy logic diagnosis system for vibration monitoring. Proceedings of Artificial Neural Networks in Engineering Conference “ANNIE-93”, pp. 757–762.
  19. Siu, C. C., Shen, Q, & Milne, R. A. (1997). Fuzzy Expert System for Turbomachinery Diagnosis. IEEE Int. Conference on Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 1, pp. 555–560.
  20. Hu, Z., Cai, Y., He, X., & Xu, X. (2005). Fusion of multi-class support vector machines for fault diagnosis. American Control Conference, Vol. 3, pp. 1941–1945.
  21. Bendjebbour, A., & Pieczynski, W. (1998). Unsupervised image segmentation using Dempster-Shafer fusion in a Markov fields context. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Multisource-Multisensor Information Fusion.
  22. Hall, D. L., & McMullen, S. A. H. (2004). Mathematical Techniques in Multisensor Data Fusion. Artech House Publishers.
  23. Shengqiang, W., Wanlu, J. (2009). Research on Data Fusion Fault Diagnosis Method Based on DS Evidence Theory. International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation “ICMTMA’09”, Vol. 1, pp. 689–692.
  24. Shao, W. Y. H., & Wang, X. (2004). Soft sensing modeling based on support vector machine and Bayesian model selection. Computers and Chemical Engineering, Vol. 28, Issue 8, pp. 1489–1498.

Full Text




Scientific journal "The Journal of Engineering Sciences"
ISSN 2312-2498 (Print), ISSN 2414-9381 (Online).

Faculty of Technical Systems and Energy Efficient Technologies
Sumy State University