Real Power Loss Reduction by Rock Dove Optimization and Fuligo Septica Optimization Algorithms | Journal of Engineering Sciences

Real Power Loss Reduction by Rock Dove Optimization and Fuligo Septica Optimization Algorithms

Author(s): Kanagasabai L.

Affiliation(s): Department of EEE, Prasad V. Potluri Siddhartha Institute of Technology, Kanuru, Vijayawada, 520007, Andhra Pradesh, India.

*Corresponding Author’s Address: [email protected]

Issue: Volume 7, Issue 2 (2020)

Dates:
Paper received: May 10, 2020
The final version of the paper received: October 3, 2020
Paper accepted online: October 23, 2020

Citation:
Kanagasabai L. (2020). Real power loss reduction by Rock Dove optimization
and Fuligo Septica optimization algorithms. Journal of Engineering Sciences, Vol. 7(2), pp. E1–E6, doi: 10.21272/jes.2020.7(2).e1

DOI: 10.21272/jes.2020.7(2).e1

Research Area:  MECHANICAL ENGINEERING: Computational Mechanics

Abstract. This paper aims to use the Rock Dove (RD) optimization algorithm and the Fuligo Septica optimization (FSO) algorithm for power loss reduction. Rock Dove towards a particular place is based on the familiar (sight) objects on the traveling directions. In the formulation of the RD algorithm, atlas and range operator, and familiar sight operators have been defined and modeled. Every generation number of Rock Dove is reduced to half in the familiar sight operator and Rock Dove segment, which hold the low fitness value that occupying the lower half of the generation will be discarded. Because it is implicit that individual’s Rock Dove is unknown with familiar sights and very far from the destination place, a few Rock Doves will be at the center of the iteration. Each Rock Dove can fly towards the final target place. Then in this work, the FSO algorithm is designed for real power loss reduction. The natural vacillation mode of Fuligo Septica has been imitated to develop the algorithm. Fuligo Septica connects the food through swinging action and possesses exploration and exploitation capabilities. Fuligo Septica naturally lives in chilly and moist conditions. Mainly the organic matter in the Fuligo Septica will search for the food and enzymes formed will digest the food. In the movement of Fuligo Septica it will spread like a venous network, and cytoplasm will flow inside the Fuligo Septica in all ends. THE proposed RD optimization algorithm and FSO algorithm have been tested in IEEE 14, 30, 57, 118 and 300 bus test systems and simulation results show the projected RD and FSO algorithm reduced the real power loss.

Keywords: optimal reactive power, transmission loss, Rock Dove, Fuligo Septica.

References:

  1. Lee, K. Y. (1984). Fuel-cost minimisation for both real and reactive-power dispatches. Proceedings Generation, Transmission and Distribution Conference. Vol. 131(3), pp. 85–93.
  2. Deeb, N. I. (1998). An efficient technique for reactive power dispatch using a revised linear programming approach. Electric Power System Research. Vol. 15(2), pp. 121–134.
  3. Bjelogrlic, M. R., Calovic, M. S., Babic, B. S. (1990). Application of Newton’s optimal power flow in voltage/reactive power control. IEEE Trans Power System, Vol. 5(4), pp. 1447–1454.
  4. Granville, S. (1994). Optimal reactive dispatch through interior point methods. IEEE Transactions on Power System. Vol. 9(1), pp. 136–146, doi: 10.1109/59.317548.
  5. N. Grudinin.(1998). “Reactive power optimization using successive quadratic programming method,” IEEE Transactions on Power System, vol/issue: 13(4), pp. 1219–1225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/59.736232.
  6. Ng, R., Sulaiman, M. H., Mustaffa, Z., Daniyal, H. (2017). Optimal reactive power dispatch solution by loss minimization using moth-flame optimization technique. Appl. Soft Comput., Vol. 59, pp. 210–222.
  7. Chen, G., Liu, L., Zhang, Z., Huang, S. (2017). Optimal reactive power dispatch by improved GSA-based algorithm with the novel strategies to handle constraints. Appl. Soft Comput., Vol. 50, pp. 58–70.
  8. Naderi, E., Narimani, H., Fathi, M., Narimani, M. R. (2017). A novel fuzzy adaptive configuration of particle swarm optimization to solve large-scale optimal reactive power dispatch. Appl. Soft Comput., Vol. 53, pp. 441–456.
  9. Heidari, A. A., Ali Abbaspour, R., Jordehi, R. (2017). Gaussian bare-bones water cycle algorithm for optimal reactive power dispatch in electrical power systems. Appl. Soft Comput., Vol. 57, pp. 657–671.
  10. Morgan, M., Abdullah, N. R. H., Sulaiman, M. H., Mustafa, M., Samad, R. (2016). Benchmark studies on optimal reactive power dispatch (ORPD) based multi-objective evolutionary programming (MOEP) using mutation based on adaptive mutation adapter (AMO) and polynomial mutation operator (PMO). Journal of Electrical Systems, Vol. 12(1), pp. 121–132.
  11. Ng, R., Sulaiman, M. H., Mustaffa, Z. (2016). Ant lion optimizer for optimal reactive power dispatch solution. Journal of Electrical Systems, Special Issue “AMPE2015”, pp. 68–74.
  12. Anbarasan, P., Jayabarathi, T. (2017). Optimal reactive power dispatch problem solved by symbiotic organism search algorithm. 2017 Innovations in Power and Advanced Computing Technologies (i-PACT), pp. 1–8, doi: 10.1109/IPACT.2017.8244970.
  13. Gagliano, A., Nocera, F. (2017). Analysis of the performances of electric energy storage in residential applications. International Journal of Heat and Technology, Vol. 35(1), pp. S41–S48, doi: 10.18280/ijht.35Sp0106.
  14. Caldera, M., Ungaro, P., Cammarata, G., Puglisi, G. (2018). Survey-based analysis of the electrical energy demand in Italian households. Mathematical Modelling of Engineering Problems, Vol. 5(3), pp. 217–224, doi: 10.18280/mmep.050313.
  15. Basu, M. (2016). Quasi-oppositional differential evolution for optimal reactive power dispatch. Electrical Power and Energy Systems, Vol. 78, pp. 29–40.
  16. Weise, T. (2009). Global Optimization Algorithms – Theory and Application. Retrieved at: http://www.it-weise.de.
  17. Mirjalili, S., Lewis, A. (2016). The whale optimization algorithm. Advanced Engineering Software, Vol. 95, pp. 51–67.
  18. IEEE (1993). The IEEE-Test Systems. Retrieved at: http://www.ee.washington.edu/trsearch/pstca.
  19. Hussain, A. N., Abdullah, A. A., Neda, O. M. (2018). Modified Particle swarm optimization for solution of reactive power dispatch. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, Vol. 15(8), pp. 316–327, doi: 10.19026/rjaset.15.5917.
  20. Reddy, S. S. (2017). Optimal reactive power scheduling using cuckoo search algorithm. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Vol. 7(5), pp. 2349–2356.
  21. Reddy, S. S., et al. (2014). Faster evolutionary algorithm based optimal power flow using incremental variables. Electrical Power and Energy Systems, Vol. 54, pp. 198–210.
  22. Dai, C., Chen, W., Zhu, Y., Zhang, X. (2009). Seeker optimization algorithm for optimal reactive power dispatch. IEEE T. Power Syst., Vol. 24(3), pp. 1218-1231.
  23. Subbaraj, P., Rajnarayan, P. N. (2009). Optimal reactive power dispatch using self-adaptive real coded genetic algorithm. Power Syst. Res., Vol. 79(2), pp. 374-381.
  24. Pandya, S., Roy, R. (2015). Particle swarm optimization based optimal reactive power dispatch. Proceeding of the IEEE International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Communication Technologies (ICECCT), pp. 1–5.

Full Text




© 2014-2024 Sumy State University
"Journal of Engineering Sciences"
ISSN 2312-2498 (Print), ISSN 2414-9381 (Online).
All rights are reserved by SumDU