Damage Behavior of Multilayer Axisymmetric Shells Obtained by the FDM Method | Journal of Engineering Sciences

Damage Behavior of Multilayer Axisymmetric Shells Obtained by the FDM Method

Author(s): Salenko O.1, Drahobetskyi V.2*, Symonova A.2, Onishchenko E.1, Kostenko A.1, Tsurkan D.1, Vasiukov D.3

Affiliation(s):
1 National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”, 37, Peremohy Ave., Kyiv, 03056 Ukraine;
2 Kremenchuk Mykhailo Ostrohradskyi National University, 20, Pershotravneva St., 39600 Kremenchuk, Ukraine;
3 IMT Nord Europe, École Mines Télécom, IMT-Université de Lille, Guglielmo Marconi St., F-59650 Villeneuve-d’Ascq, France

*Corresponding Author’s Address: [email protected]

Issue: Volume 11, Issue 1 (2024)

Dates:
Submitted: September 4, 2023
Received in revised form: December 27, 2023
Accepted for publication: January 2, 2024
Available online: January 11, 2024

Citation:
Salenko O., Drahobetskyi V., Symonova A., Onishchenko E., Kostenko A., Tsurkan D., Vasiukov D. (2024). Damage behavior of multilayer axisymmetric shells obtained by the FDM method. Journal of Engineering Sciences (Ukraine), Vol. 11(1), pp. D27–D35. https://doi.org/10.21272/jes.2024.11(1).d4

DOI: 10.21272/jes.2024.11(1).d4

Research Area:  Dynamics and Strength of Machines

Abstract. This research rigorously explores the additive synthesis of structural components, focusing on unraveling the challenges and defect mechanisms intrinsic to the fused deposition modeling (FDM) process. Leveraging a comprehensive literature review and employing theoretical modeling and finite element analysis using ANSYS software, the study meticulously investigates the behavior of multilayer axisymmetric shells under varying internal pressure conditions. Critical parameters are identified, and the impact of design factors, including material properties, geometric parameters, and internal pressure, is quantitatively assessed using a rich digital dataset. In a series of model experiments, the study reveals specific numerical results that underscore the progressive nature of damage development in FDM-produced multilayer axisymmetric shells. Notably, under increasing internal pressure, stresses on the tank’s inner walls reach up to 27.5 MPa, emphasizing the critical importance of considering material properties in the design phase. The research also uncovers that the thickness of tank walls, while significant in resulting stresses, does not markedly impact the damage development mechanism. However, it places a premium on selecting rational parameters for the honeycomb system, including shell thickness, honeycomb height, honeycomb wall thickness, and honeycomb cell size, to minimize stress concentrations and enhance structural integrity. The inclusion of honeycomb structures in the tank design, as evidenced by specific results, provides enhanced thermal insulation properties. The research demonstrates that this design feature helps localize damage and mitigates the formation of significant trunk cracks, particularly along generative cracks.

Keywords: additive synthesis, honeycomb structures, damage development, finite element analysis.

References:

  1. Vaezi, M., Seitz, H., Yang, S. (2013). A review on 3D micro-additive manufacturing technologies. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 67(5-8), pp. 1721–1754. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4605-2
  2. Litot, O., Man’ko, T. (2020). Methods of graphic construction of the process of manufacturing the power shell of composite fuel tanks. Journal of Rocket and Space Technology, Vol. 28 (4), pp. 75–81. https://doi.org/10.15421/452010
  3. Kumar, S.A., Prasad, R.V.S. (2021). Chapter 2 – Basic principles of additive manufacturing: different additive manufacturing technologies. Additive Manufacturing, Vol. 2021, pp. 17–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822056-6.00012-6
  4. Cano-Vicent, A., Tambuwala, M.M., Hassan, S.S., Barh, D., Aljabali, A.A.A., Birkett, M., Arjunan, A., Serrano-Aroca, A. (2021). Fused deposition modelling: Current status, methodology, applications and future prospects. Additive Manufacturing, Vol. 47, 102378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.102378
  5. Cevik, U., Kam, M. (2020). A review study on mechanical properties of obtained products by FDM method and metal/polymer composite filament production. Journal of Nanomaterials, Vol. 2020, 6187149. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6187149
  6. Syrlybayev, D., Zharylkassyn, B., Seisekulova, A., Akhmetov, M., Perveen, A., Talamona, D. (2021). Optimisation of strength properties of FDM printed parts – A critical review. Polymers, Vol. 13(10), 1587. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13101587
  7. Garg, A., Bhattacharya, A. (2017). An insight to the failure of FDM parts under tensile loading: finite element analysis and experimental study. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, Vol. 120, pp. 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.11.032
  8. Torrado, A.R., Roberson, D.A. (2016). Failure analysis and anisotropy evaluation of 3D-printed tensile test specimens of different geometries and print raster patterns. J Fail. Anal. and Preven. Vol. 16, pp. 154–164. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-016-0067-4
  9. Bukkapatnam, S., Clark, B. (2007). Dynamic modeling and monitoring of contour crafting – An extrusion-based layered manufacturing process. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng, Vol. 129(1), pp. 135–142. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2375137
  10. Caminero, M.A., Chacón, J.M., García-Moreno, I., Rodríguez, G.P. (2018). Impact damage resistance of 3D printed continuous fibre reinforced thermoplastic composites using fused deposition modeling. Composites Part B: Engineering, Vol. 148, pp. 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.04.054
  11. Park, S., Watanabe, N., Rosen, D.W. (2018). Estimating failure of material extrusion truss structures based on deposition modeling and a cohesive zone model. Materials & Design, Vol. 147, pp. 122–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.03.034
  12. Shanmugam, V., Rajendran, D.J.J., Babu, K., Rajendran, S., Veerasimman, A., Marimuthu, U., Singh, S., Das, O., Neisiany, R.E., Hedenqvist, M.S., Berto, F., Ramakrishna, S. (2021). The mechanical testing and performance analysis of polymer-fibre composites prepared through the additive manufacturing. Polymer Testing, Vol. 93, 106925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106925
  13. Avramov, K., Uspensky, B. (2023). Nonlinear vibrations of doubly curved composite sandwich shells with FDM additively manufactured flexible honeycomb core. Acta Mech, Vol. 234, pp. 1183–1210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-022-03426-w
  14. Avramov, K.V., Uspenskyi, B.V., Urniaieva, I.A., Breslavskyi, I.D. (2023). Bifurcations and stability of nonlinear vibrations of a three-layer composite shell with moderate amplitudes. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 26 (2), pp. 6–15. https://doi.org/10.15407/pmach2023.02.006
  15. Salenko, A., Kostenko, A., Tsurkan, D., Zinchuk, A., Zagirnyak, M., Orel, V., Arhat, R., Derevianko, I., Samusenko, A. (2023). A new FDM printer concept for printing cylindrical workpieces. In: Information Technology for Education, Science, and Technics. ITEST 2022. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, Vol. 178, pp. 459–483. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35467-0_28
  16. Das, P., Islam, M.A., Somadder, S., Hasib, M.A. (2022). Analytical and numerical analysis of functionally graded (FGM) axisymmetric cylinders under thermo-mechanical loadings. Materials Today Communications, Vol. 33, pp. 104405. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.104405
  17. Litot, A., Man’ko, T. (2020). Modeling of a multilayer composite material of a fuel tank flange from CFRP. System Technologies, Vol. 6(131), pp. 3–9. https://doi.org/10.34185/1562-9945-6-131-2020-01
  18. Lawrence, W., Fisher, P.E. (2005). Selection of Engineering Materials and Adhesives. CRC Press – Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
  19. Khaleelullah, A., Basha, S.J., Rangavittal, H.K. (2012). Design and analysis of propellant tanks support structure for an advanced spacecraft. International Journal of Applied Research in Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 1(2), pp. 75–81. https://doi.org/10.47893/IJARME.2012.1035
  20. Salenko, O., Zagirnyak, M., Orel, V., Shlyk, S., Kulynych, V. (2022). FDM products strength increasing using the algorithmic means of 3-D printers working. In: 2022 IEEE 4th International Conference on Modern Electrical and Energy System (MEES), pp. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/MEES58014.2022.10005667
  21. Salenko, O., Dzhulii, D., Drahobetskyi, V., Symonova, A., Moloshtan, D. (2023). Damage mechanisms of multilayer axisymmetric shells obtained by the FDM method. In: Advances in Design, Simulation and Manufacturing VI. DSMIE 2023. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, pp. 270–281. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32774-2_27
  22. Tichý, T., Šefl, O., Veselý, P., Dušek, K., Bušek, D. (2021). Mathematical modelling of temperature distribution in selected parts of FFF printer during 3D printing process. Polymers, Vol. 13(23), 4213. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13234213

Full Text

© 2024 by the author(s).

This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International License




© 2014-2024 Sumy State University
"Journal of Engineering Sciences"
ISSN 2312-2498 (Print), ISSN 2414-9381 (Online).
All rights are reserved by SumDU