Standardizing Life Cycle Organization: A Synergetic Quality Management Approach

Author(s): Prokopovych I. V.1*, Kokhanov A. B.1, Khamitov V. M.1, Tikhenko V. M.1, Dašić P.2

Affiliation(s):
1 Odessа Polytechnic National University, 1, Shevchenko Ave., 65044 Odessa, Ukraine;
2 High Technical Mechanical School of Professional Studies, 19, Radoja Krstića St., 37240 Trstenik, Serbia

*Corresponding Author’s Address: [email protected]

Issue: Volume 10, Issue 1 (2023)

Dates:
Submitted: February 21, 2023
Received in revised form: May 9, 2023
Accepted for publication: May 19, 2023
Available online: May 25, 2023

Citation:
Prokopovych I. V., Kokhanov A. B., Khamitov V. M, Tikhenko V. M., Dašić P. (2023). Standardizing life cycle organization: A synergetic quality management approach. Journal of Engineering Sciences, Vol. 10(1), pp. B1-B7, doi: 10.21272/jes.2023.10(1).b1

DOI: 10.21272/jes.2023.10(1).b1

Research Area:  MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING: Technical Regulations and Metrological Support

Abstract. Standardization is essential for innovation (on the impacts on design, manufacturing, and operation processes) and its dissemination, both within a country and internationally. A phenomenological information model has been developed for the system of standards, which will be used as an information base for integrated quality management systems, environmental safety, and energy saving depending on the type of products, requirements of technical regulations, and conformity assessment procedures. Phase portraits of the life cycle system of complex products were constructed, and a general expression for the Lyapunov exponents characterizing the overall behavior of the dynamic system in phase space was obtained. The presence of particular areas to which, regardless of the initial conditions, all phase trajectories rapidly evolve has been established. The critical conditions for the control parameters were found. A diagram was constructed that determines the stability of the system states of the life cycle of complex products. It was found that the processes of the life cycle of complex products are carried out in two stages: in the first, there is a rapid evolution of components and parameters of technical and software tools, as well as energetic elements of functional subsystems, which is reflected in a specific attractive section of phase portraits, in the second, further slow development along it.

Keywords: additive manufacturing, industrial growth, production function, state parameter, synergetic order parameter.

References:

  1. Zaloga, V., Dyadyura, K., Rybalka, I., Pandova, I. (2019). Implementation of integrated management system in order to enhance equipment efficiency. Management Systems in Production Engineering, Vol. 27(4), pp. 221-226.
  2. Zaloga, V., Dyadyura, K., Rybalka, I., Pandova, I., Zaborowski, T. (2020). Enhancing efficiency by implementation of integrated management system in order to align organisational culture and daily practice. Management Systems in Production Engineering, Vol. 28(4), pp. 304-311.
  3. ISO 9001:2015 Quality Management Systems – Requirements.
  4. ISO/TS 9002:2016 Quality Management Systems – Guidelines for the Application of ISO 9001:2015.
  5. ISO 14044:2006 Environmental Management – Life Cycle Assessment – Requirements and Guidelines.
  6. Krenicky, T., Hrebenyk, L., Chernobrovchenko, V. (2022). Application of concepts of the analytic hierarchy process in decision-making. Management Systems in Production Engineering, Vol. 30(4), pp. 304-310.
  7. Dyadyura, K., Hovorun, T.P., Pylypenko, O.V., Hovorun, M.V., Pererva, V.I. (2017). Influence of roughness of the substrate on the structure and mechanical properties of TiAlN nanocoating condensed by DCMS. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 7th International Conference on Nanomaterials: Applications and Properties, NAP 2017, 01FNC10.
  8. Sukhodub, L.F., Dyadyura, K. (2018). Design and fabrication of polymer-ceramic nanocomposites materials for bone tissue engineering. Journal of Nano- and Electronic Physics, Vol. 10(6), 06003.
  9. Blind, K., Von Laer, M. (2022). Paving the path: Drivers of standardization participation at ISO. J Technol Transf, Vol. 47, pp. 1115-1134.
  10. Jemghili, R., Ait Taleb, A. Mansouri, K. (2023). A collaborative multidisciplinary design methodology for additive manufacturing with a left-handed mouse as a case study. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, Vol. 125, pp. 4925-4951).
  11. Santolaya, J.L., Lacasa, E., Biedermann, A. et al. (2019). A practical methodology to project the design of more sustainable products in the production stage. Res Eng Design, Vol. 30, pp. 539-558.
  12. Ghoroghi, A., Rezgui, Y., Petri, I. et al. Advances in application of machine learning to life cycle assessment: A literature review. Int J Life Cycle Assess, Vol. 27, pp. 433-456.
  13. França, W.T., Barros, M.V., Salvador, R. et al. (2021). Integrating life cycle assessment and life cycle cost: A review of environmental-economic studies. Int J Life Cycle Assess, Vol. 26, pp. 244-274.
  14. King, C.W. (2022). Interdependence of growth, structure, size and resource consumption during an economic growth cycle. Biophys Econ Sust., Vol. 7, 1.
  15. Malik, A.I., Kim, B.S. (2021). Coordination supply chain management under flexible cleaner production system and stochastic conditions. Ann Oper Res, Vol. 21, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04303-w
  16. Sadler, H. (2020). ER2C SDMLC: Enterprise release risk-centric systems development and maintenance life cycle. Software Qual J., Vol. 28, pp. 1755-1787.
  17. Priarone, P.C., Catalano, A.R. Settineri, L. (2023). Additive manufacturing for the automotive industry: On the life-cycle environmental implications of material substitution and light-weighting through re-design. Prog Addit Manuf, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-023-00395-x
  18. Favi, C., Campi, F. Germani, M. (2019). Comparative life cycle assessment of metal arc welding technologies by using engineering design documentation. Int J Life Cycle Assess., Vol. 24, pp. 2140-2172.
  19. Yanıkoğlu, İ., Albey, E., Okçuoğlu, S. (2022). Robust parameter design and optimization for quality engineering. Oper. Res. Forum, Vol. 3, 8 (2022).
  20. Siran, K.C., Dipendra, G. (2021). Progress in sustainable structural engineering: a review. Innov. Infra-struct. Solut., Vol. 6, 68.
  21. Dyadyura, K., Hrebenyk, L., Krenicky, T., Zaborowski, T. (2021). Modeling of the manufacturing systems state in the conditions of the lean production. MM Science Journal, Vol. 2021(June), pp. 4408-4413.
  22. Cao, Y., Liu, Y., Ye, X. et al. (2020). Software-physical synergetic design methodology of mechatronic systems based on formal functional models. Res Eng Design, Vol. 31, pp. 235-255.
  23. Zhang, X., Dong, S. (2019). Analysis on supply-demand system of automotive manufacturer-supplier with synergetics. Cluster Comput., Vol. 22(3), pp. 6817-6826.

Full Text